ALLPORT, F. H. Toward a Science of Public Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 1, n. 1, p. 7-23, 1937.
BAKSHY, E. et al. Everyone's an Influencer: Quantifying Influence on Twitter. Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2011. Hong Kong, China. ACM. p.65-74.
BASTOS, M. T. A. Public Opinion Revisited: The propagation of opinions in digital networks. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, v. 4, n. 2+3, p. 179–195, 2011.
BEILIN, J. et al. The Iranian Election on Twitter: The First Eighteen Days. Web Ecology Project. Boston: 26/06/2009. 2009
CASTI, J. L. Mathematical Systems and Real-World Truths. In: HEGSELMANN, R. e PEITGEN, H.-O. (Ed.). Modelle sozialer Dynamiken: Ordnung, Chaos und Komplexität. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1996.
CULOTTA, A.; BEKKERMAN, R.; MCCALLUM, A. Extracting Social Networks and Contact Information from Email and the Web. CEAS-1, 2004.
GARCÍA, C. Rethinking Walter Lippmann’s legacy in the history of public relations. PRism, v. 7, n. 1, 2010. Disponível em: < http://www.prismjournal.org >.
HABERMAS, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991a.
______. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991b.
______. Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press, 1996.
______. The Public Sphere. In: GOODIN, R. E. e PETTIT, P. (Ed.). Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997. p.103-106.
______. Mudança estrutural da esfera pública: investigações quanto a uma categoria da sociedade burguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2003.
HABERMAS, J.; LUHMANN, N. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Socialtechnologie - Was leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1971.
HEGSELMANN, R.; PEITGEN, H.-O. Modelle sozialer Dynamiken: Ordnung, Chaos und Komplexität. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1996. 245 S.
HOHENDAHL, P. U.; SILBERMAN, M. Critical Theory, Public Sphere and Culture. Jürgen Habermas and His Critics. New German Critique, n. 16, p. 89-118, 1979. Disponível em: < http://www.jstor.org/stable/487878 >.
IZUZQUIZA, I. La sociedad sin hombres: Niklas Luhmann o la teoría como escándalo. Barcelona: Anthropos, 1990.
KJAER, P. F. Systems in Context: On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann-Debate. Ancilla Iuris, v. 66, 2006.
KNODT, E. Toward a Non-Foundationalist Epistemology: The Habermas/Luhmann Controversy Revisited. New German Critique, v. 61, n. Special Issue on Niklas Luhmann, p. 77-100, 1994. Disponível em: < http://www.jstor.org/stable/488622 >.
KOOPMANS, R. Movements and Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere. Theory and Society, v. 33, n. 3/4, Special Issue: Current Routes to the Study of Contentious Politics and Social Change, p. 367-391, 2004. Disponível em: < http://www.jstor.org/stable/4144877 >.
KWAK, H. et al. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , WWW 2010: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web, 2010. New York, NY, USA. ACM. p.591--600.
LATANÉ, B. The Emergence of Clustering and Correlation from Social Interaction. In: HEGSELMANN, R. e PEITGEN, H.-O. (Ed.). Modelle Sozialer Dynamiken: Ordnung, Chaos Und Komplexität. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1996.
LEAVITT, A. et al. The Influentials: New Approaches for Analyzing Influence on Twitter. Web Ecology Project. Boston: 02/09/2009, p.18. 2009
LEYDESDORFF, L. Luhmann, Habermas, and the theory of communication. Systems research and behavioral science, v. 17, n. 3, p. 273-288, 2000.
LOTAN, G. et al. The Arab Spring - The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions. 2011. Disponível em: < http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246/613 >.
LUHMANN, N. Öffentliche Meinung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, v. 11, n. 1, p. 2-28, 1970.
______. Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995.
______. Realität der Massenmedien. Opladen: Westdeutscher, 1996.
______. The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
______. A realidade dos meios de comunicação. São Paulo: Paulus, 2005.
MARCONDES FILHO, C. Comunicação e ação política no contínuo mediático. Luhmann contra Habermas. E nós contra todos. Revista Galaxia, v. 8, n. 15, 2008. Disponível em: < http://www.revistas.univerciencia.org/index.php/galaxia/article/view/5732/5189 >.
NOOY, W. D.; MRVAR, A.; BATAGELJ, V. Exploratory Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
NOWAK, A.; LEWENSTEIN, M.; FREJLAK, P. Dynamics of Public Opinion and Social Change. In: HEGSELMANN, R. e PEITGEN, H.-O. (Ed.). Modelle sozialer Dynamiken: Ordnung, Chaos und Komplexität. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1996.
RASCH, W. Theories of Complexity, Complexities of Theory: Habermas, Luhmann, and the Study of Social Systems. German Studies Review, v. 14, n. 1, p. 65-83, 1991. Disponível em: < http://www.jstor.org/stable/143015 >.
RATKIEWICZ, J. et al. Detecting and Tracking the Spread of Astroturf Memes in Microblog Streams. 2010. Disponível em: < http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3768 >.
SENA, N. M. D. Espaço público, opinião e democracia. Estudos em Comunicação, v. 1, p. 270-304, 2007.
SUO, S.; CHEN, Y. The Dynamics of Public Opinion in Complex Networks. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, v. 11, n. 4, p. 2, 31-Oct-2008 2008. Disponível em: < http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/2.html >.
VERSTRAETEN, H. The Media and the Transformation of the Public Sphere. European Journal of Communication, v. 11, n. 3, p. 347-370, September 1, 1996 1996. Disponível em: < http://ejc.sagepub.com/content/11/3/347.abstract >.
WU, S. et al. Who Says What to Whom on Twitter. New York: Yahoo! Research 2011.
XIE, J. et al. Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities. Physical Review E, v. 84, n. 1, p. 011130, 2011. Disponível em: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011130 >.
